strings_theory: (ida36)
Jolyne Cujoh ([personal profile] strings_theory) wrote in [community profile] irisnetwork2019-07-05 03:14 pm

UN: GreenDolphin

[Guess who's back to their commentary bitching, Daybreak? It's everyone's favorite delinquent. Who is absolutely having Stone Free type for her, fuck off.]

Hey, here's a fucking question for all of you:
When does setting a person on fire actually constitute a reasonable act of force?

Because fuck you.

On that note, keep your shit together as I ain't punching things again for a couple of weeks and if anyone wants to do me a huge favor and not ask why my arms are wrapped in bandages? Really would appreciate it.

Also.

Fuck you, Keith.
onebetter: (talking)

un: j.griffin

[personal profile] onebetter 2019-07-05 08:32 pm (UTC)(link)
In the situation where someone attacks you unprovoked while using their power and tries to kick you further when you're still literally on the floor.

When someone is trying to beat you to a pulp, self-defense is justified. Nobody who randomly assaults another person should be surprised by consequences.

The fact that Daybreak Academy as a school allows violent attacks on their own students within its own premises is worrisome.


[ He's more posting this so anyone who isn't Jolyne or Keith knows the context. ]
onebetter: (mission mode)

[personal profile] onebetter 2019-07-05 08:38 pm (UTC)(link)
Justified self-defense is what would have happened.

I don't know what magically-distorted universe you live in, but in the real world people die by assault like yours. It's not legal or moral either.

Pleading moral superiority when you're the aggressor is laughable.
onebetter: (defiant)

[personal profile] onebetter 2019-07-05 08:44 pm (UTC)(link)
Intent and potential consequence aren't the same.

Whether or not you meant to kill him was never up for debate. What matters is what you did and what risks for consequence you accepted by doing it.

I'm done with this discussion. This conversation paints the reality well enough for anyone reading.